<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN' 'https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd'>
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal> 

<PublisherName>H &amp; T PUBLICATION</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>Journal of Earth Sciences and Technology</JournalTitle>

<Issn>2719-4094</Issn>
<Volume>4</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus='epublish'>
<Year>2023</Year>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effect of Well Completion Configuration and Tubing Sizes on Well Performance</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>31</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>48</LastPage> 
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>Bright Bariakpoa Kinate</Author>
<Author>Kingdom Onyemuche Choko</Author>
<Author>Utibe Aniefiok Eto</Author>
<Author>Edikan Bassey Iwah</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			 
		<Abstract>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’Cambria’,serif;&quot;&gt;Completion types and tubing sizes have been identified to play a major role in achieving an optimum production rate while utilizing the reservoir energy optimally. Adequate &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;completion helps in&lt;/span&gt; optimizing production while minimizing pressure drop and predicting the longest flowing time. In this work, the effect of well completion configuration and tubing sizes on well performance was evaluated with a steady state simulator (PIPESIM&amp;reg;). A wellbore model was built and completed with both casing and liner completions with flow through the tubing and annulus.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Sensitivity analysis was run for different tubing sizes for a given completion type and flow configuration on the well performance&lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;. Results showed&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;that increase&lt;/span&gt; in tubing sizes from 2.441 inches to 2.992 inches for cased hole completion yielded 22.28% increase in production rate and 22.26% increase in production rate when the tubing sizes was increased from 2.441 inches to 2.992 inches for liner completion for tubing flow respectively. For tubing and annular flow, &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;production increased&lt;/span&gt; from 4867.531STB/day to 4875.321STB/day for tubing sizes of 4.5 inches to 4.9 inches for liner completion and the same production rate of 4872.075STB/day &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;with &lt;/span&gt;tubing sizes of 4.5 inches to 4.9 inches for open hole completion. This work has shown that changing the tubing sizes &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;for optimization should only&lt;/span&gt; be considered for cased hole and liner completions &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;with tubing flow configuration&lt;/span&gt; because both casing and liner completion &lt;span style=&quot;color: black; mso-themecolor: text1;&quot;&gt;methods with tubing&lt;/span&gt; and annular flow gave almost the same results as the tubing sizes were changed. Therefore, completion type with tubing sizes should be examined during design of a well to enhance productivity.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
<Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Completion Configuration</Param>
</Object><Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Tubing sizes</Param>
</Object><Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Production rate</Param>
</Object><Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Well performance</Param>
</Object><Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Cased hole</Param>
</Object><Object Type='keyword'>
<Param Name='value'>Liner Completion</Param>
</Object>
</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType='pdf'>http://www.htpub.org/article/Journal-Of-Earth-Sciences-And-Technology/vol/4/issue/1/articleid/1181</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>